For years, the anti-European parties and press have been gnashing their teeth and beating their breasts about a 'European superstate', a situation recently exerbacated by the new constitution which will see the end of Britain as a nation yadda yadda. My question is this: why is this necessarily a bad thing? Being someone who's still idealistically looking forward to the day of the World Government, this doesn't seem like such a bad thing to me. But I'm bound to be missing something, so (without this turning into a thread like this) tell me what. Note that I'm not saying that the EU is necessarily the best model for a European state (in fact, I don't think that it is), but let's leave that behind for the moment and indulge in some sheer hypothetical thinking.
BlogOfTheMoon
Monday, June 21, 2004
So, what's wrong with a European state anyway?
Comments facility provided by blogKomm
The original text and layout of this page are copyright © Rajnish Bhaskar, 1997 – 2012. All images are copyrighted to their respective owners. All copyrights and trademarks are acknowledged on the copyrights page. Read the privacy policy at LordOfTheMoon.com
All views on this website or elsewhere on the web under the 'LordOfTheMoon' name are purely personal and reflect my own views and nothing else. If you have any comments or anything else to say, email me at and tell me.
[Home] - [Blog] - [Peace] - [My Writings] - [Science Fiction] - [Computing] - [CV] - [About me] - [Links] - [Sitemap]